Friday, July 29, 2016

My continued Journey living with HIV





I wanted to check in today to let everyone know how things have been going lately.

About two months ago I was contacted by the IDI Clinic at OU Hospital that they would no longer be accepting my insurance. As you can imagine I freaked out. I ended up calling my DHS Case Manager who informed me that she had other clients that that has happened to since the first of the year. I am on Blue Cross Blue Shield Medicare Advantage of Oklahoma so I never thought that would be the case since I also have Ryan White which covers my co-pays at the IDI Clinic. In the state of Oklahoma the IDI Clinic at OU Hospital is the only place that Ryan White covers. Luckily the pharmacy at OU still accepts my insurance and ADAP helps me with my co-pays.

Needless to say I had to find a new ID Doctor. Although I now have to pay the $40 co-pay, it turns out it is the GREATEST thing that has happened to me since finding out I am HIV Positive. My new ID Doctor got her training at Dow University in Pakistan, her fellowship at Drexal University in Pennsylvania, and her residency at Lincoln Medical Center in New York and she actually cares about every aspect of my health – NOT just HIV. She even said that she needs to monitor other things that happen to my health because of the HIV and the medication for HIV. She said because she gives me the medication for HIV she needs to monitor my health because of the side effectsfrom the HIV medication. My previous ID Doctor said she only gave me one pill and that was all she was concerned with. I am truly blessed to have this new IDDoctor. She has already run other tests on me and is learning what is actually causing a lot of my health issues. 

It is so nice to have another Doctor in my group of Doctors that cares about my health. God has been so good to me to get me all the Doctors I have. I now have the BEST PCP, Heart Doctor, HIV Doctor, GI Doctor, Thyroid Doctor and Kidney Doctor.All my Doctors work together to keep me in the best health I can be considering all the things that have been going wrong with my health. I am currently without a Neurologist because mine moved out of state. I also currently do not have mental health doctor because the ID Clinic quit taking my insurance. With the help of my new ID Doctor I should get these two issues resolved shortly.

This month will mark a new leg of my journey living with HIV because my new ID Doctor is starting me on a different HIV medication. I am super excited to be getting switched to an HIV medication that is less harmful to my bones and kidneys. As of August 2016 I will be taking Genvoya for the treatment of HIV.

https://www.genvoya.com/

I have had great results with Atripla another one of Gilead’s Medications for HIV. However, the time has come to move on to a new medication that will be better for my overall health. I will be updating my journey in a couple of months when I have had time to see how my body adjusts to this new regimen. For now I just have to say one more time how thankful I am that God has brought this new ID Doctor into my life.

I may have HIV – But HIV DOES NOT HAVE ME!!

God is good all the time.

Blessings and Peace,
David

Wednesday, July 27, 2016

AIDS Raises Risk of Death After Heart Attack

July 26, 2016
________________________________________________________________ 

People with an AIDS diagnosis have a higher risk of dying following a hospital admission for an acute myocardial infarction (AMI, or heart attack) or stroke compared with HIV-negative individuals. Publishing their findings in The Journal of Infectious Diseases, researchers studied data on 18,369,785 AMI and stroke hospitalizations recorded in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample between 2002 and 2012.

People with an AIDS diagnosis were 3.03 times more likely to die following a hospital admission for AMI and 2.59 times more likely to die following admission for a stroke compared with HIV-negative individuals. People with an AIDS diagnosis were 3.14 times more likely to be discharged to nonhospital inpatient facilities after an AMI-related admission and 1.45 times more likely to experience this outcome following a stroke-related admission than HIV-negative individuals. The difference in either outcome was minimal between HIV-positive people without an AIDS diagnosis and HIV-negative individuals.

The researchers concluded that their findings implied “that preserving immune function may improve cardiovascular outcomes in HIV-infected persons.”

To read the study abstract, click here.

To read more HIV/AIDS articles, click here.
 

Long-Acting Injectable HIV Treatment Advances to Phase III Trials


July 20, 2016
__________________________________________________________ 

A long-acting injectable HIV treatment of cabotegravir and Edurant (rilpivirine) dosed every four weeks will advance to Phase III trials after eight-week dosing proved less successful. Forty-eight-week results from the Phase IIb, multicenter, parallel group, open-label study of LATTE-2, which included 309 treatment-naive adults with HIV, were presented at the 21st International AIDS Conference in Durban, South Africa (AIDS 2016).

Results from the first 32 weeks of the trial were presented in February at the 2016 Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections (CROI) in Boston.

Participants initially went through a 20-week treatment induction period, treated with daily oral cabotegravir plus Epzicom (abacavir/lamivudine). Those with an undetectable viral load, 286 people all told, were then randomized 2 to 1 to 1 into the study’s maintenance period to receive injections of cabotegravir plus Edurant every four or eight weeks or to continue taking the same oral regimen.

Five percent of those receiving injections every eight weeks had a detectable viral load 48 weeks into the maintenance period, compared with less than 1 percent of those in the four-week dosing group and no one on the oral regimen. Five out of the six people in the eight-week dosing group did subsequently achieve a fully suppressed viral load, however. Three participants experienced virologic failure during the study, including one in the oral treatment group (at week eight) and two in the eight-week dosing group (at weeks four and 48, respectively).

Individuals in the injectable groups commonly experienced grade 1 or 2 injection site pain, which lasted a median of three days.

Seven percent of those in the injectable group experienced serious adverse health events during the maintenance period, as did 5 percent of those in the oral treatment group; none of these events was judged related to the HIV treatment.

The researchers concluded that both four-week and eight-week dosing of long-acting cabotegravir and Edurant led to good virologic response rates and were generally well tolerated through 48 weeks of treatment. However, rates of those with detectable viral loads at the end of the study period were modestly better among those in the four-week dosing group compared with the eight-week group. Consequently, the four-week dosing was chosen to advance to Phase III trials. Meanwhile, researchers will continue to evaluate the four- and eight-week dosing methods among the participants in the LATTE-2 trial.

Read more articles here: POZ
 

HIV Testing in the United States


Jun 24, 2016

____________________________________________________ 


HIV testing is integral to HIV prevention, treatment, and care. Knowledge of one’s HIV status is important for preventing the spread of disease. Studies show that those who learn they are HIV positive modify their behavior to reduce the risk of HIV transmission.1,2   Early knowledge of HIV status is also important for linking those with HIV to medical care and services that can reduce morbidity and mortality and improve quality of life.3 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services guidelines recommend starting treatment as soon as one  is diagnosed with HIV and new research (including the Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Treatment study or START) has underscored the importance of starting treatment early.4,5  Recent policy decisions have expanded health insurance coverage of HIV testing, meaning that people with health insurance – both public and private – have greater access to testing.6,7,8 And, where insurance is not available, HIV testing can often be obtained at no cost.

Key Dates in the History of HIV Testing9
1981: First AIDS case reported
1984: Human immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) identified
1985: First test for HIV licensed (ELISA)
1987: First Western Blot blood test kit
1992: First rapid test
1994: First oral fluid test
1996: First home and urine tests
2002: First rapid test using finger prick
2003: Rapid finger prick test granted CLIA (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments) waiver
2004: First rapid oral fluid test (also granted CLIA waiver)
2006: CDC recommends routine HIV screening in U.S. health care  settings10
2007: CDC launches Expanded HIV Testing Initiative in U.S.
2007: WHO/UNAIDS global guidelines recommend routine HIV screening in health care settings11
2010: First test approved that detects both antigen and antibodies12
2012: First rapid oral fluid home test13
2013: USPSTF gives routine HIV screening an “A” rating14
2013: First rapid test approved that detects both antigen and antibodies, and distinguishes between acute and established HIV-1 infection15
2015: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announces Medicare coverage of annual HIV screening for all beneficiaries 15-65, and for those older and younger beneficiaries at “increased risk” for HIV16

Testing Recommendations and Requirements

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends routine HIV screening in health-care settings for all adults, aged 13-64, and repeat screening at least annually for those at high risk (e.g., CDC says that sexually active gay and bisexual men may benefit from more frequent testing, such as every 3 to 6 months).17

According to the CDC, risk behaviors include:18
  • injection drug or steroid use or sharing equipment (such as needles, syringes, works) with others;
  • unprotected vaginal, anal, or oral sex with men who have sex with men, multiple partners, or anonymous partners;
  • exchanging sex for drugs or money;
  • diagnosis with or treatment for hepatitis, tuberculosis, or a sexually transmitted disease, like syphilis;
  • unprotected sex with anyone who falls into an above category, or with someone whose history is unknown.
Additionally, HIV testing is recommended for all pregnant women and for any newborn whose mother’s HIV status is unknown.19 Treatment provided to HIV positive women when pregnant can significantly lower the risk of transmission to her baby.20 HIV testing is also recommended for anyone who has been sexually assaulted.

CDC recommends that all HIV screening be voluntary, and opt-out (patient is notified that the test will be performed and consent is inferred unless the patient declines) vs. opt-in (test is offered to the patient who must explicitly consent to an HIV test, often in writing).21

HIV testing is mandatory in the U.S. in certain cases, including for: blood and organ donors;22 military applicants and active duty personnel;23 federal and state prison inmates under certain circumstances;24,25 and newborns in some states.26 As of January 2010, HIV testing is no longer mandatory for those wishing to emigrate to the United States or for refugees.27

Insurance Coverage of HIV Testing

HIV testing that is “medically necessary” – recommended by a physician due to risk – is generally covered by insurance.  For those without insurance, HIV testing can be obtained at little or no cost in some settings (e.g., stand-alone HIV testing sites, mobile testing clinics).  Coverage of routine HIV screening (when risk is not needed), however, was historically not covered.  This changed in April 2013 when the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) gave routine HIV screening of all adolescents and adults, ages 15 to 65, an “A” rating – generally aligning the rating with the CDC’s HIV screening guidelines.28 This rating expands the already existing “A” rating for people at increased risk for HIV (such as injection drug users and men who have sex with men), and for all pregnant women. The USPSTF ratings, developed by an independent panel of clinicians and scientists, are important because many private and public insurers link their coverage of preventive services to those rated “A” or “B” by the USPSTF.  Moreover, the Affordable Care Act (ACA), passed in 2010, requires or incentivizes insurers to cover preventive services rated “A” or “B” and do so without cost-sharing, as follows:
  • Private Insurance: The ACA requires that all private plans (except those that are grandfathered meaning they were in place before the ACA was passed and have made no significant changes to coverage) must cover routine HIV testing without cost-sharing.29
  • Medicaid: While all traditional state Medicaid programs must cover “medically necessary” HIV testing,30 state coverage of “routine” HIV screening varies because it is an optional benefit under Medicaid. A recent analysis found that more than two thirds of state Medicaid programs do cover routine HIV screening.31 Medicaid programs expanded under the ACA are required to cover preventive services rated “A” or “B” by the USPSTF, including HIV testing, without cost-sharing.
  • Medicare: In April 2015, CMS expanded Medicare coverage to include annual HIV testing for beneficiaries ages 15-65 regardless of risk, and those outside this age range at increased risk.32 Additionally, Medicare will cover up to three tests for pregnant beneficiaries.33

Testing Statistics

Figure 1: Percent of Non-Elderly Who Report Being Tested for HIV, by Race/Ethnicity, 2012
Figure 1: Percent of Non-Elderly Who Report Being Tested for HIV, by Race/Ethnicity, 2012
  • As of 2012, more than half (54%) of U.S. adults, aged 18-64, reported ever having been tested for HIV, including 22% who reported being tested in the last year. The share of the public saying they have been tested for HIV at some point increased between 1997 and 2004, but has remained fairly steady since then.34
  •  
  • Of those U.S. adults, aged 18-64, who say they have never been tested for HIV, nearly 6 in 10 (57%) say it is because they do not see themselves as at risk.35
  •  
  • HIV testing varies by state, age, and race/ethnicity.36,37,38,39,40 For example, Blacks and Latinos are significantly more likely to report having been tested for HIV than whites.
  •  
  • According to a recent survey of gay and bisexual men in the U.S., relatively few report being tested as regularly as is often advised. Seven in 10 say they have been tested at some point in their lives, one in five say they were tested within past six months, and 3 in 10 say they’ve never been tested for HIV, a share that rises to 44 percent among those under age 35.41
  •  
  • Among the more than 1.2 million people living with HIV/AIDS in the U.S., an estimated 13% do not know they are infected (down from 25% in 2003) and knowledge of HIV status is even lower among some populations.42

Testing Sites and Policies

HIV testing is offered at CDC funded testing sites (accounting for more than 3 million tests) and in other public and private settings, including free-standing HIV counseling and testing centers, health departments, hospitals, private doctor offices, and STD clinics.43 While testing also occurs in community settings and in mobile testing units, those testing positive for HIV are most likely to have been tested in health care facilities (e.g., inpatient and outpatient facilities, emergency rooms).44

All states/territories have moved to HIV name reporting (in addition to reporting AIDS cases) where a person’s name is reported to the state if they test HIV positive. The state then reports the number of unique positive HIV tests to CDC (no names or other personally identifying information are reported to CDC; only clinical and basic demographic information are forwarded). This is considered confidential HIV testing. There is also anonymous HIV testing offered at some testing sites where identifying information is not collected.

Testing Techniques

Most HIV tests used to screen for HIV infection detect the presence of antibodies produced by the body to fight HIV. Detectable antibodies usually develop within 3-8 weeks after infection, but may take longer; the period after initial infection with HIV before detectable antibodies develop is the “window period.”45  In 2010, the FDA approved the first HIV diagnostic test that detects both antibodies and antigen, a component of the virus that triggers the production of antibodies.46  In 2013, the FDA approved the first rapid antigen-antibody test, the first test also to distinguish between acute and established HIV-1 infection.47  Tests for antigen allow for earlier detection of HIV because they can detect the virus before the body has mounted a response, although there will still be a window period of approximately two weeks after initial infection during which no test can detect the virus. RNA, or nucleic acid tests, which detect the virus itself in the blood, are also available, but not routinely used for screening. The test may be used in cases where there has been a high-risk exposure to HIV and as a follow-up test to a positive antibody test.48

The currently available tests used to diagnose HIV infection in the U.S. are below. They differ based on type of specimen tested (whole blood, serum, or plasma; oral fluid; urine); how the specimen is collected (blood draw/venipuncture; finger prick; oral swab; via urination); where the test is done (laboratory; point-of-care site; at home); and how quickly results are available (conventional or rapid).49,50 The main types of tests are:
  • Conventional Blood Test: Blood sample drawn by health care provider; tested at lab. Results: less than an hour to several days, depending on location.
  • Conventional Oral Fluid Test: Oral fluid sample collected by health care provider, who swabs inside of mouth; tested at lab. Results: a few days to two weeks. Avioq is the only FDA-approved conventional oral fluid test for HIV, which is used with OraSure, the only FDA-approved collection device for oral fluid.
  • Rapid Tests:51 Sample collected by health care provider at lab or care site, depending on complexity of rapid test. Results: in as little as 10 minutes. If test is negative, no further testing is needed. If positive, test must be confirmed with a more specific test through conventional method. There are eight FDA-approved rapid tests: OraQuick Advance Rapid HIV-1/2 Antibody Test (whole blood finger prick or venipuncture; plasma; oral fluid); Reveal Rapid HIV-1 Antibody Test (serum; plasma); Uni-Gold Recombigen HIV Test (whole blood finger prick or venipuncture; serum; plasma); Multispot HIV-1/HIV-2 Rapid Test (serum; plasma); INSTI HIV-1 Antibody Test (whole blood finger prick or venipuncture; plasma); Alere Determine HIV-1/2 Ag/Ab Combo Test (serum; plasma; whole blood finger prick or venipuncture); and two Clearview tests – Clearview HIV 1/2 Stat Pak, Clearview Complete HIV 1/2 (whole blood; serum; plasma). Some rapid tests have been granted CLIA waivers which allow them to be used outside traditional laboratories.
  • Home Tests: There are two approved home tests. For the HomeAccess HIV-1 Test System, an individual performs the test by pricking finger with a lancet, placing drops of blood on treated card, and mailing to lab for testing. Identification number on card is used when phoning for results; counseling and referral available by phone. Results: in as little as three days. In July 2012, the FDA approved the first rapid oral fluid test for home use – OraQuick In-Home HIV Test. Results: in as little as 20 minutes.  Both home tests may be purchased from drug stores and online.52
  • Urine Test: Urine sample collected by health care provider; tested at lab. Calypte is the only FDA-approved HIV urine test. Results: a few days to two weeks.
Endnotes
  1. CDC, MMWR 55(RR14); September 2006.

  2. CDC, MMWR 52(15); April 2003.

  3. CDC, MMWR 55(RR14); September 2006; CDC, MMWR 52(15); April 2003.

  4. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents; updated January 2016.

  5. AIDSinfo, Statement by the HHS Panel on Antiretroviral Guidelines for Adults and Adolescents Regarding Results from the START and TEMPRANO Trials.

  6. AIDS.gov, “The Affordable Care Act and HIV/AIDS.”

  7. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, “Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV): Screening;” April 2013.

  8. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Decision Memo for Screening for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection (CAG-00409R);” April 2015.

  9. KFF, Global HIV/AIDS Timeline.

  10. CDC, MMWR 55(RR14); September 2006.

  11. WHO/UNAIDS Press Release, “WHO and UNAIDS issue new guidance on HIV testing and counselling in health facilities;” May 2007.

  12. FDA Consumer Information, “Fourth Generation HIV Diagnostic Test Approved, permitting earlier detection of infection;” June 2010.

  13. FDA Approval Letter, July 3, 2012 Approval Letter, OraQuick In-Home HIV Test.

  14. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, “Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV): Screening;” April 2013.

  15. FDA Consumer Information, “First rapid diagnostic test to detect both HIV-1 antigen and HIV-1/2 antibodies approved.”

  16. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Decision Memo for Screening for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection (CAG-00409R);” April 2015.

  17. CDC, MMWR 55(RR14); September 2006.

  18. CDC, HIV Basics: Testing.

  19. CDC, MMWR 55(RR14); September 2006.

  20. CDC, MMWR 55(RR14); September 2006.

  21. CDC, MMWR 55(RR14); September 2006.

  22. FDA, “Keeping Blood Transfusions Safe: FDA's Multi-layered Protections for Donated Blood,” Publication No. FS 02-1; February 2002.

  23. U.S. Department of Defense, Instruction Number 6485.01; October  2006.

  24. U.S. Federal Bureau of Prisons, Legal Resource Guide to the Federal Bureau of Prisons; November 2008.

  25. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, HIV in Prisons, 2007-2008; December 2009.

  26. KFF/NASTAD, The National HIV Prevention Inventory; July 2009.

  27. CDC, “Final Rule Removing HIV Infection from U.S. Immigration Screening.”

  28.  U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, “Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV): Screening;” April 2013.

  29. KFF, Preventive Services Covered by Private Health Plans under the Affordable Care Act; June 2015.

  30. Each state Medicaid program determines its own definition of medical necessity, although it generally refers to procedures recommended by a physician.  In the case of HIV, for example, HIV testing is clinically indicated based on a patient’s risk factors and/or signs of HIV infection.

  31. KFF, State Medicaid Coverage of Routine HIV Screening; February 2014.

  32. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Decision Memo for Screening for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection (CAG-00409R);” April 2015.

  33. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, “Decision Memo for Screening for the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection (CAG-00409R);” April 2015.

  34. The Washington Post/KFF. 2012 Survey of Americans on HIV/AIDS; July 2012. “Don’t know” responses not shown; totals may not equal 100% due to rounding.

  35. The Washington Post/KFF. 2012 Survey of Americans on HIV/AIDS; July 2012. “Don’t know” responses not shown; totals may not equal 100% due to rounding.

  36. The Washington Post/KFF. 2012 Survey of Americans on HIV/AIDS; July 2012. “Don’t know” responses not shown; totals may not equal 100% due to rounding.

  37. CDC, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

  38. CDC, Early Release of Selected Estimates from the January – September 2013 National Health Interview Survey; March 2014.

  39. CDC, National Health Interview Surveys.

  40. CDC, MMWR 65(6); June 2016.

  41. KFF, HIV/AIDS In The Lives Of Gay And Bisexual Men In The United States; September 2014.





  42. FDA Consumer Information, “Fourth Generation HIV Diagnostic Test Approved, permitting earlier detection of infection;” June 2010.



  43. Jeffrey L. Greenwald et al., “A Rapid Review of Rapid HIV Antibody Tests,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 8(2); March 2006.

  44. FDA, Complete List of Donor Screening Assays for Infectious Agents and HIV Diagnostic Assays.

  45. Jeffrey L. Greenwald et al., “A Rapid Review of Rapid HIV Antibody Tests,” Clinical Infectious Diseases 8(2); March 2006; FDA, Complete List of Donor Screening Assays for Infectious Agents and HIV Diagnostic Assays.


  46. Read more articles here: KFF

Prince Harry's HIV test inspired a 500% increase in people checking their status, says charity

Prince Harry takes an HIV test

_________________________

The royal took the test live in front of cameras to encourage more people to get themselves checked out - and it seems to be working

___________________________

Prince Harry’s live HIV test led to a five-fold increase in requests for home testing kids, an HIV charity has revealed.

The Terrence Higgins Trust described the effect of the prince’s social media appeal as a “groundbreaking moment in the fight against HIV ”.

The charity was running a pilot scheme offering people the chance to find out their status by sending off for a 15-minute HIV self-testing kit when Harry sat down for his test on Thursday July 14.

And on that day and the following day they experienced requests of around 150 BioSure tests per day in contrast to the 32 orders they took on July 12.


 The Prince's test aimed to raise awareness 

Dr Michael Brady, Medical Director for the Terrence Higgins Trust , said: “We know that one in six people living with HIV do not know that they have it.

“Testing puts you in control and, thanks to treatment, will stop you from getting seriously ill, enable you to live a normal lifespan and prevent you from passing the virus on to anyone else.


“That’s why it’s so important that we continue looking for new ways to make HIV testing more accessible to those most at risk, and why it’s fantastic to see the very tangible and immediate impact of Prince Harry’s support for HIV testing.”

During the pilot, the charity received orders from across the UK, from Guernsey and Northern Ireland to the Isle of Man.

 Prince Harry is shown the negative result of his HIV test by psychotherapist Robert Palmer 

In total, 4,750 free BioSure HIV self tests, which would normally cost £29.95, were shipped and the pilot has closed.

Half of all these people got in touch with the Terrence Higgins Trust to share their result and 26 people told the charity that they had received a positive result.

They got a personal call from the Terrence Higgins Trust to discuss their result, provide support and ensure that they know how to access HIV care.
  • For more information about HIV testing, visit www.tht.org.uk or call Terrence Higgins Trust’s free, confidential helpline THT Direct on 0808 802 1221.
About HIV Testing in United States: KFF

Tuesday, July 26, 2016

Undetectable = Uninfectious

Undetectable - Uninfectious 



 

 


There is now revolutionary and evidence-based confirmation that the risk of HIV transmission from people living with HIV on Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) with an undetectable viral load in their blood for at least 6 months is negligible.


However, the majority of people with HIV and their medical providers are not aware of the extent to which treatment prevents transmission.

Most of the information online about HIV transmission risk is not based on current research and is influenced by agency restraints and politics, perpetuating HIV-related stigma and discriminatory sex-negative approaches towards people living with HIV.

Sharing this knowledge can reduce decades of HIV-related stigma, create a powerful new incentive for people with HIV to initiate and adhere to treatment, and thereby further reduce new HIV transmissions, notwithstanding the many social, cultural and legal barriers to testing, treatment and long-term adherence which must also be addressed.

It’s a profound mental, cultural and social shift to acknowledge that if a person living with HIV has an undetectable viral load, they cannot transmit HIV with or without condoms to HIV negative partners. 

 

Undetectable Primer


We collaborated with multiple agencies, activists and the world's top researchers  to create this short Primer as a starting point to help people living with HIV with an undetectable status answer the most fundamental question:

Am I a risk to my partners?

The answer is NO. If you take your medications properly, you will not pass on HIV to your partner.  Stay on treatment, Stay undetectable, Stay uninfectious.

We were frustrated by the conflicting, outdated and biased information online regarding the risk of HIV transmission from someone with an undetectable status, so we went straight to the lead researchers of PARTNER, HPTN 052 and OPPOSITES ATTRACT as well as the world's leading experts in the field to answer that question and back it up with sources. 
Click here or on the icon above to download the Primer. A more detailed FAQ, provider guide, media guide and major social marketing campaign will follow.

Want to get involved? Questions or feedback?  Get in touch

Getting to that point means rewiring thirty-five years of deeply entrenched fears of HIV and the people who have HIV, and challenging longstanding unproven assumption that condoms are always necessary to prevent HIV transmission. 



Please join us to change the narrative about our infectiousness. 


We are Undetectable and Uninfectious. 
 _______________________________
 NOTE:  An undetectable viral load only protects against HIV transmission to your sexual partners. Condoms help prevent STIs and pregnancy. The HIV prevention method you choose may be different depending upon your sexual practices and relationships. For instance, if you’re having sex with multiple partners or in a non-monogamous relationship, you might consider using condoms to prevent other STIs.




 VIDEO FROM BEYONDPOSITIVE
__________________________________________

The Undetectable Primer's Consensus Statement on "Negligible" risk is Endorsered by: 



  • Dr. Myron Cohen – Principal Investigator, HPTN 052; Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases, UNC School of Medicine, North Carolina, USA
  • Dr. Demetre C Daskalakis, MPH - Assistant Commissioner, Bureau of HIV/AIDS Prevention and Control New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, USA
  • Dr. Andrew Grulich – Principal Investigator, OPPOSSITES ATTRACT; Head of HIV Epidemiology and Prevention Program, Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Australia
  • Dr. Jens Lundgren – Co-principal Investigator, PARTNER; Professor, Department of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Dr. Pietro Vernazza – Executive Committee, PARTNER; Author, Swiss Statement 2008, Update 2016; Chief of the Infectious Disease Division, Cantonal Hospital in St. Gallen, Switzerland


      Additional Support: 



  • Dr. Julio Montaner – Director of the British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS; Director of IDC and Physician Program Director for HIV/AIDS PHC, Canada
  • Professor Dame Sally Davies – Chief Medical Officer, England
  • Dr. Alison Rodger – Lead Author PARTNER; University College London, United Kingdom
  • Professor David Cooper – Director of the Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society. University of NSW, Australia
  • Simon Collins, Steering Committee – PARTNER, i-BASE
  • Dr Michael Brady, Medical Director – Terrence Higgins Trust, England

​​

Thank you to PAC's Founding Task Force for their review of the Primer; to Professor Carrie Foote (Indiana University-Indianapolis) and Edwin Bernard (HIV Justice Network), who reviewed and provided valuable input on the Primer; to Peter Staley, Gus Cairns of NAM-AIDSMap and Mark S. King of MyFabulousDisease.com for their concept development and research; and to Broadway Cares / Equity Fights AIDS for their generous lead funding. 

Read more articles here: http://www.preventionaccess.org/