Tuesday, May 2, 2017

๐Ÿณ️‍๐ŸŒˆ✝️Select Walgreens Clinics Now Offering HIV, Hepatitis and STI Testing


May 2, 2017


____________________________________________________________________________________ 



In select cities across the country, Walgreens Healthcare Clinics are now offering testing for HIV, viral hepatitis and several sexually transmitted infections, according to a press release from the pharmacy chain.

The initiative—which was launched with support from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) at the tail end of its STD Awareness Month programming—will offer customers a chance to get tested at specialty Walgreens Clinics in the following cities: Cincinnati; Cleveland; Columbus, Ohio; Dallas; Denver; Houston; Kansas City; Knoxville; Las Vegas; Louisville; Memphis; Nashville; Orlando; Philadelphia; Phoenix; Tucson; Washington, DC; and Wichita. 

Each participating location will staff several nurse practitioners and physician assistants to conduct consultations, conduct STI testing and offer treatment or a referral to a specialist, as needed. In addition to testing, select Walgreens clinics will also be expanding their HIV prevention and early detection services as part of the program. In Houston, certain pharmacies will also begin prescribing Truvada as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) on-site for those hoping to prevent an HIV infection.

“Offering these new services on our Healthcare Clinics demonstrates our ongoing commitment to improving the comprehensive health and wellbeing of our patients,” said Pat Carroll, MD, chief medical officer for Walgreens Healthcare Clinics. “We’re proud to introduce the testing services during STD Awareness in April, and support the CDC in raising public awareness about the impact that STDs — the diseases that can develop from STIs — can have on the lives of Americans and the importance of testing and prevention.” 

lso, as part of the initiative, Walgreens pharmacy staff and store managers chain-wide will be taking continuing education classes in HIV treatment and care, including specially-designed courses around HIV stigma, adherence and HIV prevention, thanks to the pharmacy’s recent collaboration with the National Alliance of HIV Education and Workforce Development.

Approximately 400 Walgreens stores currently offer Healthcare Clinic or other provider retail clinic services. Click here to check out which locations are currently offering HIV, hepatitis and STI testing.

Read more articles from POZ, here.
 

๐Ÿณ️‍๐ŸŒˆ✝️‍Love Is Not Defined by Your Status


April 4, 2017


__________________________________________________________________________________ 



In 2005, I had an HIV-positive boyfriend, when I was HIV negative. I was never scared of having sex with my boyfriend, and he told me on the very first day.

I felt honored to hear such an intimate thing from the beginning, because it showed that he really liked me.

Far from being an obstacle, it made him more interesting to me, and until today, with no doubt, he was the person that I loved the most.

So, I thought I was well informed on HIV, but life proved me wrong 9 years later.

The last time I tested HIV negative was in June, 2014, and at the end of that summer, in a casual sex encounter, I had accident with a condom: it broke.

I asked him immediately if he was HIV negative, because otherwise I could always go to a Hospital to get PEP [Post-Exposure Prophylaxis] before 72 hours passed. He reassured me that he tested negative five days ago, and I should not worry at all, because he always used condoms.

He even gave me his phone number, and because we talked about it for an hour, I sort of made the decision that it was OK, that he was OK. I thought that I did not need to go to a hospital and take PEP for a month. I could skip that mess, because how could he possibly give me his number and be so self-confident on the matter, if it was not true ... would not make sense. Big mistake.

What I did learn, is that you do not get HIV from people who are diagnosed with HIV [who take their meds and have undetectable viral loads]. They are usually on meds and undetectable, and if they were not, they would tell you if a condom breaks, you would not even need to ask. Therefore, my question after the condom broke was simply stupid: he was not aware that he was HIV positive. He probably did not always use condoms. He happened to be in the window period with a huge viral load that increased the chances of transmission exponentially, and he tested negative five days before we met.

Bad luck, and wrong decision on my side based on a misconception on the profile of a potential HIV transmission.

But things got worse. Totally unaware of my new status, shortly after my condom accident, I started to go out with a man I'd met two years before. Destiny wanted us to get closer and we started to sleep together in September and fall in love. When I realized that I really liked the guy, I decided to get tested for HIV again, fearless, not even remembering that accident with the condom. I actually wanted to get tested in order to go a step further with him in our relationship.

When they gave me the news, I was in shock, the word "positive" was the last thing I was expecting. How could that happen? Then suddenly a flashback of the condom accident came to my mind, and bingo! That's how it happened. I was more worried on how could I tell this to the boyfriend that I was dating at the moment, than of the consequences of being HIV positive. My real worry was that the person that I was starting to fall in love with, could reject me. It would break my heart, because I really wanted to be with him.

After two sleepless nights, he called me to find out what was wrong with me, and I told him at my place. His first reaction was awesome. He said it was irrelevant for him, just a sign on a paper. He stayed with me, holding me and calling me "my boy." We started to sleep together on a daily basis. His words were very comforting, making plans for the summer, he wanted to fill the wall of my room with his drawings, sang songs for me in the car and in the shower, he liked me to touch him no matter where we were, introduced me to his sister and his girlfriend, I did not even remembered that I just got HIV, I was in love.

Unfortunately, I was not able to read the contradictory signals that came together with that bliss that I felt. Since I was diagnosed we never had sex again, lots of kissing and holding, but no genital sex. He never came with me to a single doctor's appointment. He never let me speak about my HIV results, after 30 seconds he always changed the subject. He ended up dropping me a month after my diagnosis, when I least expected it, out of the blue, He vanished.

I still remember the last day we spent together, I felt humiliated several times that day. He was avoiding my kisses and putting chocolate in my mouth instead, placing his pillow as a barrier in the bed, rejecting my first approach after one month for trying to have sex with him, jumping out of the bed getting dressed and telling me to walk the dog while he took a shower alone. In the morning, we went for a coffee with his sister and he put distance between us, making a bad taste joke about a bruise on my arm, saying that "my husband" should stop hitting me.

I did not know how to react, because that bruise came from the blood test I had the day before, and he was my boyfriend until that week. He drove me to downtown, parked the car, and 300 meters before arriving to his job, he indicated to me the path to my home. He did not want people to see me with him. That is the last time I saw him.

It was almost traumatic to deal with a broken heart and a new HIV status, I felt the deepest loneliness I ever experienced in my life. I fell into deep depression, I could not accept the rejection. I felt that I'd lost the love of my life because of HIV.

I was wrong, he was not the love of my life, he was the biggest mistake of my life, a bad person trying to be a good person but unable to accomplish it, and unable to love. It took me some time to understand that part. The only good thing that I got from him, is that I decided to get tested, and I was diagnosed early. By Dec. 23, I was already on treatment and three weeks later I was undetectable.

There are two lessons that I took from these events in my life. The first one is useless for me now, but not necessarily for the people who might be reading this: "You do not get HIV from a person who is diagnosed with HIV and correctly adhered to his treatment, you usually get it for people who are undiagnosed." "HIV Undetectable means Untransmittable." [Science shows that people living with HIV who have undetectable viral loads cannot pass HIV to their sexual partners.] The second one, is that if you happen to get HIV, it may hurt you in the beginning, yes, but after some time it will make you a much bigger person, and will also be a powerful tool to exclude from your life people who are not worth your time, and to include the really valuable ones. You will be surrounded by quality people because you do not deserve less than that.

And remember this, love is not defined by your status, because HIV does not define who you are.

Bubu lives is Spain and is an activist for #UequalsU.

Read more articles from the Body, here.

 

Monday, May 1, 2017

๐Ÿณ️‍๐ŸŒˆ✝️ Dems Re-Introducing LGBT Rights Bill


May 01 2017


__________________________________________________________________________________ 



Democrats including House minority leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate minority leader Chuck Schumer are gathering Tuesday morning at the Capitol's Rayburn Room to announce the re-introduction of the Equality Act, which would ban anti-LGBT discrimination nationwide.

Expected at Tuesday's ceremony is Oregon senator Jeff Merkley, Washington senator Patty Murray, New Jersey senator Cory Booker, and out politicians like Wisconsin senator Tammy Baldwin and Rhode Island congressman David Cicilline; Chad Griffin, president of the Human Rights Campaign, and Mara Keisling, executive director of the National Center for Transgender Equality, will also be in attendance. Many of the politicians and activists gathering at the Capitol on Tuesday supported an earlier iteration of the Equality Act, which stalled in a House committee during President Obama's second term.  

The legislation will obviously face an uphill battle, with Republicans controlling both chambers of Congress, as well as the presidency. While President Trump claims to be an advocate for LGBT rights, he doesn't support marriage equality and has waged a war against LGBT rights, especially transgender rights, during his first 100 days, which have been marked by chaos and failure.

If it ever passes, the Equality Act would amend the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to include sexual orientation and gender identity as groups protected against discrimination in housing, employment, and public accomodations. Currently, over half of LGBT Americans live in jurisdictions where they can be legally fired or denied an apartment or mortgage simply because of their sexual orientation or gender identity.





Read more articles from the Advocate, here.

๐Ÿณ️‍๐ŸŒˆ✝️ To whom should I disclose my HIV-positive status?


May 1, 2017 By Lambda Legal 


____________________________________________________________________________________ 


 
This is a deeply personal decision that individuals must make for themselves. The most common situation involving a legal obligation to disclose one’s HIV-positive status is to sexual partners — not previous partners, but current and new ones. 
Some states require this. See “Disclosing your HIV Status” and “HIV Criminalization” for more information.

You also may have a legal obligation to disclose when you share injection drug equipment with someone; donate blood, organs or tissue; do a certain job (there are very few of these); or visit a physician or a dentist in the state of Arkansas (the only state with this requirement).

In general, Lambda Legal does not encourage people to disclose their HIV-positive status to employers and service providers who might discriminate  unless there is a legal obligation to provide that information or it is in the person’s best interest to disclose. Lambda Legal is working to limit or eliminate the instances in which disclosure of one’s status is legally required.

On the other hand, Lambda Legal recognizes the benefits of voluntary disclosure — both for the person living with HIV and for the people in their lives — when it is truly safe for the person to share this information. With those benefits in mind, we will continue to work toward a world where it is not only safe to do so, but where people living with HIV feel empowered to share their status, are not stigmatized or marginalized as a result and can thereby access the care and support they need from family, friends and co-workers.

Founded in 1973, Lambda Legal is the oldest and largest national legal organization whose mission is to achieve full recognition of the civil rights of LGBT people and all people living with HIV through impact litigation, education and public policy work. 

Go to LambdaLegal.org/Know-Your-Rights for more information.

Read more articles from POZ, here.

Sunday, April 30, 2017

๐Ÿณ️‍๐ŸŒˆ✝️ Boy Silenced: Surviving Sexual Abuse

Photo courtesy of Google Images.

  Internationally known LGBTQ columnist,
 actor, male model, and HIV awareness activist. 

04/05/2017 


___________________________________________________________________________________ 



Child sexual abuse is widespread and one of the most difficult subjects to openly talk about. It is almost unbelievable to realize that social sexual stigmas often trump a child’s ability to speak out and seek help. There is an ugly truth that is rarely discussed, and it speaks volumes to the criminal neglect that social homophobia places on male youth. Sexually abused boys are forced into silence because society refuses to view homosexuality as anything other than abnormal. Too ashamed and too frightened by the “gay” label, sexually abused boys many times over are forced to keep their abuse to themselves. I was one of those boys.


I was nine years old when it happened. Sparing the graphic and unnecessary details, I never told a soul. I grew up in a household and community that were religiously tied to condemning anything that wasn’t straight, Caucasian and gender role specific. Gay was this mysterious and threatening “behavior” that was made out to be evil. I realized “gay” involved men who were affectionate toward each other like a man and woman in “normal” society. I had limited comprehension of what sex was and was completely vulnerable and defenseless against the sexual abuse, as any child would be.


The encounter left me silently shaken; it was an incredibly overwhelming experience that no child should ever have to go through. Adding to the residual scars from the abuse was the confusion I was left to deal with on my own—as a child. Fearing that I somehow was to blame, that I would be treated the way “gays” were by those closest to me, wrapping my head around the beginning realization that I was gay and the deep-seated shame that I felt were just some of the obstacles I encountered that prevented me from telling anyone. I have since come to understand that a sexually abused boy who would seek help and support from adults who harbor homophobic social ideology would be victimized yet again—a tremendous burden to bear, especially for someone so young.


In the United States, 1 in 53 boys under the age of 18 experience sexual abuse or assault at the hands of an adult. This statistic seems too low in comparison to 1 in 8 girls being sexually abused. It might be underreported due to social sexual stigmas. Reliable estimates of how many boys experience childhood sexual abuse are difficult to come by. Many survivors keep their experiences secret, so police data doesn’t provide good enough estimates. Male youth tend to suffer in silence because of fear, and, when their “manhood” or social identity is questioned, they simply do not report. Current studies place more realistic statistics at one out of every six boys and one out of every four girls will experience sexual abuse before the age 16. These statistics should have rippled across the nation long ago, but society continues to fail our youth. It is neither acceptable nor just for a child to be the victim of sexual abuse—no matter their gender.


Youth who keep their sexual abuse to themselves and are unable to access the support needed to emotionally heal are at greater risk for depression, drug abuse and suicide later in life. 

Unfortunately, both boys and girls face added stigma if they chose to report their abuse. It proves to be a cycle of victimization that could be ended if only the adults in the lives of youth traded stigmas and gender sexual norms for empathy and openness. We shouldn’t have such shame surrounding the sexual abuse of boys, and, as long as society continues to brush it under the rug for the sake of placing straight masculinity on a pillar, this crime will continue.


I have found myself in adulthood reeling from relationships with the men I have had in my life due to my childhood sexual abuse. Recently, I rekindled a past romance. We were in bed, and I flinched at one of his arm gestures. I realized at that moment I was always on edge with partners, fearing physical harm in those vulnerable sexual moments. Even the most tender and safe sexual encounters I have had as an adult can be reminders of what I had been through. I never wanted to tell my partners of my victimization. After I had flinched, my partner jokingly commented that I must have been abused and continued to fake hit me. That moment took my breath away. A simplistic but telling demonstration to the emotional toll childhood sexual abuse has in adulthood.



Today, I am picking up the pieces and working toward healing. Growing up, I needed to trust the adults in my life to have cared enough about me to not place social stigmas above my health and safety. I deserved to speak out without fear and to have been surrounded by compassion. 
Victimizing a victim is never warranted. Therapy has been a godsend; while it’s the most challenging thing I have ever taken part in, it has been my saving grace. Finally being able to open up and talk through this past experience is helping me heal, move on and embrace my future. Kids who have been victimized need to grow up without fearing social stigmas. It is imperative that every child have that most basic of needs met.

Read more articles from C.L. Fredrick, here.
  

๐Ÿณ️‍๐ŸŒˆ✝️ Five Things Media Makers Can Do NOW to Stand Up to HIV Stigma


Positive Women's Network USA



____________________________________________________________________________________ 


Mainstream reporting on issues concerning HIV is often sensationalized and stigmatizing, sometimes doing more harm than good. In fact, warned Josh Barro last year on MSNBC: “Negative attitudes about HIV are literally killing people.” Within the HIV community, this is widely known and well documented: Stigma fuels the HIV epidemic by creating barriers to HIV testing and care access, and by placing people with HIV at risk for discrimination and violence.

But the responsibility for addressing and ending HIV stigma cannot rest on people living with HIV alone. Makers of mainstream media have a responsibility to stop using language that labels and “others” people with HIV and communities at risk for HIV. According to a Kaiser Family Foundation survey, 62 percent of people in the US get their HIV information mainly from media. By becoming informed about the realities of living with HIV and incorporating these facts and stories into their reporting, media makers can also be some of our greatest allies in improving lives and upholding rights for people with HIV.

So, in the spirit of allyship – and helping media makers satisfy their professional responsibility to seek and report truth, Positive Women’s Network-USA (PWN-USA), a national membership body of women living with HIV, offers this primer for media makers to start today – right now! – to become allies in eliminating HIV stigma, one article and one report at a time.

To read each section of the statement as a separate article, click on the numbered section heading titles. 

Download a printable PDF version of this statement

Special thanks and deep gratitude to all the insightful PWN-USA members who acted as Co-Authors and Contributors to this statement: Valerie Wojciechowicz · Venita Ray · Naimah Oneal · Susan Mull · Asha Molock · Vickie Lynn · Tommy Luckett · Vanessa Johnson · Olga Irwin · Tami Haught · Barb Cardell

 

1. Watch Your Language!

2. Put the “Living” in “People Living with HIV”

3. Talk to Women Living with HIV

4. There Are Facts and Fictions About HIV. Choose Facts.

5. Write About HIV Disclosure as the Complicated Issue it Is

__________________________________________

 

 

 

  1. Watch your language!
The stigma attached to HIV is a significant barrier to living well with HIV.  By working together, we can raise awareness and help improve the lives of those living with HIV by being mindful of our language.  Language can be a tool to empower, or to further stigmatize.  Media messages can support HIV prevention, care, and treatment by using empowering, appropriate terminology:

a. Refer to those living with HIV as “people living with HIV.” Always put the person before the disease.  We are people first – we are not our disease.

b. Use “diagnosed with” or “acquired” HIV, instead of “infected with” HIV or “HIV-infected.”

c. Avoid words designed to shame or judge people – for example:

  • “promiscuous” to describe a person who has had multiple sex partners is a judgmental term and is often applied differently to heterosexual men, gay men, and women.
  • “prostitute” to identify a sex worker – the former is a legal term that does not apply in every context; the latter is preferred.
  • “clean” or “dirty” when referring to HIV status. Clean and dirty should only be used when referring to laundry and dishes, not people.
d. AIDS is a diagnosis and not a disease – understand the differences between HIV and AIDS. People cannot transmit AIDS. AIDS is not a virus. Read a detailed definition of “AIDS” (from The Well Project)

e. Refrain from using the term “full-blown AIDS.” This terms is still used by many media outlets – but there is no such thing as full-blown AIDS. The term is “antiquated, redundant, stigmatizing and confusing” – as one longtime HIV provider recently put it. Replace with “an AIDS diagnosis” or simply “AIDS.”

f. Apply the information above and below to headlines, the gateway to stories – and avoid sensationalist headers such as “AIDS-Positive Alabama Pastor Who Slept with Congregants Banned from Church,” from the Associated Press last October.

 


For more information: View the full slide set for PWN-USA’s webinar “Eliminating Stigma from the Language of HIV Communications”  – or view a recording of the full webinar including slides and voices of presenters




  1.   #WeAreAllPeople: Put the “Living” in “People Living with HIV”
From the beginning of the epidemic, HIV in the US has been perceived by some people as a moral issue and not a human one.  People with HIV need the media to recognize, report, and share our stories as the mothers, fathers, sisters, brothers, aunts, uncles, neighbors, and grandparents that we are.

More often than not, those of us who are people living with HIV are framed in media as monsters, infected, dirty, predatory, and more. Those who are reported as having acquired HIV – or having been intimate with a person with HIV – are labeled as victims or as having been preyed upon. In truth, people living with HIV are just that: people. HIV is the human immunodeficiency virus that attacks the CD4 cells within a PERSON. And many of our partners choose to be with us because they love us and it is not “risky” to be intimate with us.

HIV is no longer the “death sentence” it was once thought to be. It is a chronic illness that can be managed with proper care and medication. Today, people living with HIV are doing just that and beyond; they are thriving. The life expectancy of a person living with HIV who takes medication is about the same in the US as those who are negative.

When reporting on a story, it is crucial that media makers actually talk to a person living with HIV in order to get an accurate reflection of life beyond the diagnosis of HIV. It is a common occurrence that most people did not educate themselves about HIV until they received a diagnosis. They are not at fault. Many people who acquired HIV state they never believed it could happen to them – in part because messages received through media imply that people living with HIV are somehow different from those who are not, when HIV status is the only difference. Therefore:

a. Coverage of people living with HIV should highlight accomplishments and achievements that are not focused on the virus.

b. Stories of people living with HIV should include our strength, survival, and courage.

c. The media could promote the importance of ending stigma, to create environments safe for knowing one’s status, HIV testing, and open communication with partners.




  1. HIV is not just a man’s issue; it never has been. Talk to women living with HIV.
We, women living with HIV, articulate truth that must not be distilled. While living with HIV, we work, raise families, cook, help aging parents, bear children, march, protest injustices, lead the way at conferences, fall in love, and empower each other.

Women account for at least a quarter of people living with HIV in the US, and more than half of all people with HIV worldwide. This makes us the overwhelming experts. We stand bold, as in front-page news. We are not the stuff of margins.

African-American women were 64% of all women diagnosed with HIV at last count, in 2010. A third of transgender women in the US are living with HIV; the majority of transgender women diagnosed with HIV are women of color. If you are not engaged in conversations about HIV with women of color, you are really missing the point.  You may be missing the whole truth, the undisputed truth, the unadulterated story of HIV in the US.

Resources for finding women’s stories:

  • Positive Women’s Network – USA (PWN-USA) – Features a wide variety of advocacy resources for women with HIV, including opinion pieces and statements highlighting the perspectives and expertise of women advocates living with HIV.
  • The Well Project – Features cutting-edge information, personal reflections, and research by and for women with HIV.


  1. There are facts and there are fictions about HIV. Choose facts.
It is ridiculous that, more than 30 years and loads of research and lived experience into the HIV epidemic, we continue to encounter and fight the same myths and misinformation about HIV, in newspapers and on TV as well as in our daily lives.

Three key facts to remember:

a. HIV can only be transmitted through four body fluids getting into the body in very specific ways. The fluids that are capable of containing high concentrations of the virus – blood, semen, vaginal and rectal secretions, and breast milk – must come in direct contact with a mucous membrane or damaged tissue or be directly injected into the bloodstream (from a needle or syringe) for transmission to be possible. HIV transmission is not possible, under any circumstances, through a hug, a handshake, a toilet seat, sharing a cup, or eating food cooked by a person with HIV. Period. The fact that these myths persist in the general population is damaging to the wellbeing of people with HIV, and shows how great the need is for reporting on HIV that is not only accurate, but that actively counters misinformation.

b. People living with HIV can have HIV-negative babies. Now more than ever, women and men living with HIV are exercising their reproductive rights, and adding to their biological families. A baby born to a woman living with HIV has less than a 1% chance of acquiring HIV during pregnancy or birth if the baby’s mother has access to proper care and treatment. And if one partner in a couple is not living with HIV, the best prevention tool yet is for the partner who’s living with HIV to be on successful treatment. Then risk of transmission to the partner drops to virtually zero, even when having sex without condoms. Read more about that excellent and no-longer-new news here and here.

c. Laws that criminalize HIV-positive status do not protect or help women. As of this writing, 32 states and two US territories have HIV-specific laws that attach criminal penalties to the behavior and actions of people living with HIV. These laws are often framed in the media as protecting women “victims” from dishonest partners, but the laws help no one.  These laws codify stigma, and actually deter people from getting tested or being in care (a person who doesn’t know their HIV status cannot be prosecuted for HIV nondisclosure or exposure), thereby hindering public health solutions. In most HIV-related prosecutions, no transmission of HIV even occurred! Further, women have been sent to prison under these laws, and/or had their children taken away for no reason – often by partners who knew the woman’s HIV status but used the laws as a tool of abuse, coercion, or harassment when the woman attempted to end the relationship. Making it a crime not to disclose HIV-positive status should never be framed as the answer to addressing HIV in communities or to keeping people HIV negative.




  1. A person’s choice to tell someone their HIV status is complicated. Write about HIV disclosure as the complicated issue it is.
Telling another person, especially a potential partner, that you’re living with HIV is extremely complex, and not disclosing is never simply about “selfishness” or intent to harm – emotionally or otherwise.

Important points to keep in mind when reporting on HIV nondisclosure:

a. Simply saying “I’m HIV positive” is not always a safe option. The very real threat of intimate-partner violence may keep a woman from telling a partner she is living with HIV. The cases of Cicely Bolden and Elisha Henson, murdered in Texas due to their HIV status, are two devastating examples of this reality. Because of stigma and discrimination, disclosure may also place a person at risk for losing their employment, childcare provision, and more. Further, in the presence of laws that penalize people with HIV for knowing their HIV status, disclosing won’t protect a woman in a he-said-she-said argument in court, where the person who knows their HIV-positive status usually loses. Women are often the first person in the relationship to be aware of their HIV-positive status.

b. Preventing the transmission of HIV is each partner’s responsibility, not solely the partner who’s living with HIV. But unequal power dynamics in relationships, among other factors, can block the ability of either partner – whether living with HIV or not – to take action to prevent HIV. In many relationships, negotiating use of condoms or other prevention options may be difficult or even possible. One answer to empowering individuals in their relationships and fostering healthy, safe communication is to address the root causes of inequities that impact our lives and relationships, and drive the HIV epidemic – and to ensure comprehensive, medically accurate sex education. The solutions is not to blame people for having HIV, or cast their sexual partners as “victims.” Where there is a victim, there must be a perpetrator, and having HIV is not a crime.

c. HIV stigma does not operate alone; for many women of all gender identities living with HIV in the US, other stigmas – based on race, class, gender expression, sexuality, ability, or other factors – were likely already a part of life before acquiring HIV, and exacerbate HIV stigma after diagnosis. Any trait that sets a person apart from a societal norm can be challenging to talk about, or to disclose. HIV status is no different.

d. It is the right of all cisgender and transgender women, including women living with HIV, to be sexual beings. A key aspect of internalized stigma for many women with HIV is being cut off from their right to safe, pleasurable, intimate relations. When journalists convey messages that shame the sexuality of people with HIV in their reporting – as if to even be having sex as a person with HIV is somehow wrong – or imply that finding love, having sex, or being in relationships is impossible for people living with HIV, they validate that assumption. A healthy dose of nonjudgmental sex-positive messaging in mainstream media could save and improve lives.
e. Everyone who is living with HIV has a story of how they acquired HIV. It is a part of a person’s history, and does not have to involve a “victim” and a person “at fault.”

How a journalist reports on a story can determine the way the story is received – and the tone of comments people leave. A more humanizing, less oppositional approach to reporting on disclosure could foster more civil, less reactionary online discussion around challenging, and potentially unifying, topics like HIV.




BONUS: When reporting on HIV, consult community resources like the ones referenced above, and in the list below!

AIDSmap.com – Independent, clear and accurate information about HIV

AIDSMeds.com – Quality information about HIV treatment and care

AIDS United – A wide variety of HIV resources

AIDS.gov – Federal resources as well as basic information about HIV

HIVPlus Magazine – Online home of the community news magazine (HIVPlus has also developed a brief, helpful guide for journalists covering HIV)

Kaiser Family Foundation – Provides trusted information on national health issues, including HIV

POZ Magazine – Online version of the longtime print publication

Sero Project – A network of people living with HIV and allies fighting for freedom from stigma and injustice, and opposing HIV criminalization

TheBody.com – The most comprehensive HIV news, information, and support resource on the Web
 




 Read more articles from Positive Women's Network, here.

๐Ÿณ️‍๐ŸŒˆ✝️ Not One, but Two Types of Immune Cells Likely Make Up HIV’s Reservoir


Researchers have found that in addition to CD4s, macrophage cells can harbor HIV even in the face of antiretroviral treatment.
April 28, 2017


____________________________________________________________________________________ 


In yet another finding that complicates HIV cure science, researchers have established that in addition to CD4s, macrophage immune cells can harbor virus in the face of antiretroviral (ARV) treatment and prompt a viral rebound if treatment is interrupted. The findings of their research, which was conducted in humanized mice, means that not one but two types of immune cells likely make up the viral reservoir, the existence of which prevents standard ARV treatment from curing the virus.

Publishing their findings in Nature Medicine, researchers built on laboratory research finding that macrophage immune cells could support HIV replication in the absence of CD4 cells. They conducted experiments on mice that were genetically engineered to have human immune systems that lack CD4s.

They found that ARV treatment strongly suppressed HIV replication in macrophage cells of the infected mice. After stopping treatment in the animals, the virus rebounded in a third of them.

The research team will now investigate what regulates the persistence of the virus in macrophage cells, where these persistently infected cells hide out in the body during ARV treatment and how macrophages respond to treatments that seek to eradicate the virus from the body.

To read a press release about the study, click here.

To read the study abstract, click here.

Read more articles from POZ, here.