Friday, March 3, 2017

The Persistence of HIV Fear in the Age of PrEP


March 2, 2016


_________________________________________________________________________________ 


Damon Jacobs
"But if I have sex without a condom, something bad eventually has to happen."

Believe me, I know how real this thought seems. I sympathize as I see panic in response to reports of one person who acquired HIV while adherent to PrEP (after encountering HIV with incredibly rare Truvada resistance) despite the 60,000+ people on PreP for whom this didn't occur.

My own sexual awakening began at age 14, in the summer of 1985, the same time that Harrison Ford was gleefully displaying his impeccable wounded chest in the movie "Witness," and NBC daytime featured a flurry of handsome hairy hunks in various states of shirtless mayhem. My arousal and fixation on these images made it clear that I was hot for guys, and eventually was going to have to do something with all this lust for fur and muscle.

However, while I was ensconced in these soap worlds, a real-life drama was playing out on the news. Rock Hudson, whom I was familiar with more for his work on "Dynasty" then from his rich movie career, was being talked about everywhere after coming out as having AIDS.

Images of Rock Hudson

Nearly every network seemed to find it necessary to contrast the images of a young, healthy, vibrant Hudson, to the gaunt, ill, and frail man whose body was ravished by this ruthless disease. It became very clear to me at this vulnerable moment that sexual impulses led to illness and death, and if I acted on my desires, that would be me someday.

It took four more years before I would come out and become sexually active. By 1990, when I first moved to San Francisco, I understood that condoms could protect me from "getting AIDS" (the term we used back then). However, I couldn't erase the images of Rock Hudson's tragic and cruel demise. No matter how good it felt, no matter how satisfying the experience, I couldn't subtract the terror of believing that pleasure would ultimately kill me like Rock Hudson, and so many of my new friends in San Francisco.

Although my partners (both HIV positive and those who identified as negative), used condoms in every encounter back then, I still lived from HIV test to HIV test in complete and utter fear that something had gone wrong and I would be next. I constantly and vigilantly scrutinized my body for KS spots that signified the beginning of the end. Every cough, every sore throat, every fever and every night sweat was accompanied by the paralyzing thought, "This is it, I'm seroconverting." I lost sleep, I lost concentration and I lost time worrying.

The Arrival of ARVs

Once antiretroviral medications were available and accessible in the late 1990s, I came to understand that HIV was not so much as a killer as it is a treatable and chronic medical condition. Yet the side effects, especially in the early days, were often worse for some than symptoms of the disease itself. Sexual expression was still accompanied by a sense of dread in the form of "uh oh, is this the time I'm going have to pay the consequences for feeling good?"

It wasn't until I first learned about pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in 2010 that I could begin to get some distance from the fear.

I learned of the iPrEx trial while I was working in vaccine research in New York City . That was the first study to demonstrate that consistent use of Truvada in HIV-negative people could significantly reduce HIV transmission rates as high at 99%. I was astounded by this report, and decided that this was the best strategy for me to remain HIV negative. I began using Truvada as PrEP on July 19, 2011, and have been using it daily ever since.

PrEP Approval

When the FDA approval came on July 16, 2012, I was waiting for the celebration, the champagne, the confetti. Or at least an acknowledgement by Governor Cuomo. Instead ... nothing.

The news was largely ignored by media, and most agencies, organizations and traditional service providers. How could we have a crucial tool for ending new HIV infections without anyone talking about it? 

I thought the largest barrier to people using PrEP was ignorance, and that if people simply learned about it they would grasp the enormity of this opportunity. So I got active and busy. I began speaking to media about PrEP from a consumer standpoint, started writing essays, telling all my family and friends about PrEP, creating a group on Facebook devoted to "PrEP Facts" and even found a way to be included in a front page New York Times article in the Healthline section.

"Finally," I thought, "People are going to know about this, people are going to be happy to learn about this."

Not so much.

Immediately after going public with this information, I received emails from strangers full of hate, venom, calling me a "Truvada whore," "drug pusher," "sex addict," "corporate shill" and one person even called me a "passive murderer."

Literally from day one of starting my PrEP-focused Facebook group I've had people join who wanted to attack people using PrEP, calling us "dirty," "shameful," "compulsive" and "snake oils salesman."

What happened? How could a biomedical tool for preventing HIV with 99% efficacy be received with such vile and hatred?

In all my well-intended educational efforts, in all my fantasies of celebrations and confetti, I overlooked one crucial factor:

The persistent toxicity of fear.

The Theory of Learned Helplessness

Gay men like me have been inundated with traumatic images of Rock Hudson and worse for over 30 years. We have been bombarded with so-called safe sex campaigns that told us that condomless anal sex is immoral and pathological. We have been directly commanded not to "trust him," that "no glove = no love," and that not using a condom 100% of the time is tantamount to signing up for a life of isolation, alienation, depression and illness.

Our brains are wonderfully resilient yet woefully stubborn. Human minds are incredibly adaptive yet often so resistant to change. The psychology theory of "learned helplessness" describes what typically happens when a human being is exposed to a negative stimulus over an extended period of time with no escape. Eventually he or she will give up trying to avoid the source of pain, and accept they have no control over the outcome of a situation. And even when they are given a way out of a horrendous or abusive circumstance, they often choose not to let go of it, and/or respond with rage to the prospect of being free.

I have seen this dynamic play out repeatedly in forums where reactions to PrEP range from suspicion, to cautious trepidation, to ubiquitous fear, to intense rage.

"What about the side effects?" "What about STIs?" "Who can afford this?"

Even when there are scientific protocols and programs to prevent, manage and assist with these concerns, people are still jumping to the worst one central scenario: "If I have sex for pleasure, something bad will happen."

And I can completely understand how that operates. The first year I used PrEP and had condomless sex with both HIV-positive, and HIV-negative-identified partners, I still carried that fear. My 40-year-old mind simply could not absorb that feeling good wouldn't result in a painful outcome.

Once that first year passed, I fully understood that PrEP would protect me from HIV. But then -- what about those other STIs?

STI Panic

I noticed that for the first time in my life I started to worry a lot about getting an STI. In all my panicked nights prior to PrEP, the thought of having an STI never crossed my mind, but now it was suddenly haunting my interactions with others.

"What if this is it? What if he gave you syphilis? What if he gave you gonorrhea? There is simply no way you can have this much enjoyable sex without having to pay SOME kind of price for it."
During the first half of 2013, I flooded my poor doctor's office with calls. My butt was red, my ass itched, SOMETHING had to be going wrong down there. And my doctor, bless his soul, was more than willing to swab and test as needed. But test after test, time after time, there was no STI.

Indeed, my displaced fear and trauma of AIDS had manifested itself in psychosomatic symptoms of syphilis. My mind was still engaged in the learned helplessness of punishment for pleasure, long after that danger was gone. I finally began the process of completely removing fear from sexual encounters, and opened up to receiving the bliss of condomless intimacy with others.

So today, when I look in my PrEP Facts group and see people responding to fears of a sneeze or a headache or a rash, believing that PrEP had failed them, that some mutant ninja version of HIV will inevitably pass through the Truvada barrier, that STIs are waiting in the wings ready to pounce on them, and that there assuredly must be a penalty for pleasure, I sit back, I read, I understand.

And I'm not surprised to see panic about the recent story about that one case of someone acquiring HIV while adherent to PrEP -- and am committed to sharing correct information about why and how it happened, and how incredibly unlikely it is to be anything but extremely rare.

I witness how 30 years of anti-sex based messaging is still impacting our community today. I try to interject with rational facts, data, science and trials, but that seems to come as little comfort.

These are the direct and tangible side effects of fear. And they may be here to stay.

Fortunately, there is a way to cope with these side effects.

Breathe. Relax. Learn the facts about PrEP. Get support from others in your community, as well as social media. Find a sex-affirmative therapist who understands PrEP and the impact of HIV and AIDS on learned helplessness. Eventually with time, experience and willingness, you will also come to relearn that your body can be a way of experience much joy without fear.

Damon Jacobs is a New York-based licensed marriage and family therapist and HIV prevention specialist and founder of a 13,000-member Facebook group "PrEP Facts: Rethinking HIV Prevention and Sex." Follow Damon on Twitter: @DamonLJacobs.

Read more articles from theBody, here.


 

Utah House Committee: Sex Without HIV Disclosure Is 'Nonconsensual'

Credit: Tuomas_Lehtinen for iStock via Thinkstock

February 28, 2017


___________________________________________________________________________________ 


On Friday, Utah's House Judiciary Committee voted to expand the state's definition of nonconsensual sex to include when a person with HIV who knows his or her status does not disclose it prior to sexual conduct. The bill would also increase penalties for other sexual offenses when the person convicted has HIV.

"It doesn't criminalize HIV; it only criminalizes the act. So, if someone's HIV positive and they disclose, there's no problem," the sponsor of HB 369, Representative Justin Fawson, told Salt Lake City's FOX 13. "There's always a potential of transmitting HIV. We can't reduce that to zero. They have to inform a partner that they are HIV positive."

However, there is now scientific consensus that people with HIV who are virally suppressed are not at risk of transmitting HIV through sex. On Tuesday, the National Association of State and Territorial AIDS Directors (NASTAD) released a statement affirming that durably virally suppressed people living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy (ART) do not sexually transmit the virus.

"The science is clear that people living with HIV with a sustained undetectable viral load do not transmit the virus to others. What's also clear is that we have the tools to end the HIV epidemic and HIV-related stigma and make new infections a thing of the past. Today, we tackle a major part of this work by raising awareness about the latest science of HIV transmission risk," stated NASTAD executive director Murray Penner in the release.

Sean Strub, executive director of the Sero Project, a national group focused on HIV criminalization issues, told the TheBody.com that "what has been proposed in Utah is dangerous, short-sighted, contrary to best public health practices and almost certain to make the epidemic in Utah worse."

According to FOX 13, only two of eleven members of the state House Judiciary Committee voted against sending the bill to the full Utah House of Representatives for further consideration. 
OnTop Magazine noted that the committee is chaired by Representative LaVar Christensen, whom they called a "vocal opponent of LGBT rights."

In a hearing on the bill, Troy Williams, executive director of Equality Utah, said the state should promote HIV testing and treatment, and expressed concern that HB 369 could hamper efforts to prevent sexually transmitted infections, according to the Salt Lake Tribune.

"We should absolutely be enhancing penalties for intent and harm, but not the health status of the perpetrator. We would want to do everything in our power to open the doors to encourage people to be tested," he reportedly said.

JD Davids is the managing editor for TheBody.com and TheBodyPRO.com.
Follow JD on Twitter: @JDAtTheBody.

Read more artilces from theBody, here.

 

Thursday, March 2, 2017

North Carolina Family Donates $1.5 Million To LGBT Shelter In Gay Grandson’s Name


“Not all families are as understanding." 







An LGBT youth advocacy group in Charlotte, North Carolina, received a 1.5 million donation from a prestigious local family this week.

Sarah Belk Gambrell, 98-year-old heiress to the Belk chain of department stores, donated the money from the Gambrell Family Foundation. It amounts to almost half of the $3.4 million Time Out Youth is attempting to raise to build its first shelter for LGBT homeless youth.


During the TOY Board Meeting this week, we had a very special guest show up! We’d like to thank @SynchronyFinancial and their Charlotte LGBT Partnership Network Hub for the generous $5,000 grant which will be used to support our Host Home and Financial Emergency Aid programs!


TOY director Rodney Tucker calls the money “life-changing for the center and the LGBTQ community of Charlotte.” Gambrell family members, meanwhile, say it’s both a show of support for queer youth and a public stand against HB2. 

“I think HB2 is a knee-jerk reaction based on fear of what we don’t understand,” Gambrell’s daughter, Sarah Gambrell, tells the Charlotte Observer. “I just want to invest in young people so they can reach their potential and contribute to society. I’m inviting people to join me.”

Activists say the donation is as much about the Belk family name as it is the cash.



“Sarah Belk Gambrell has always been a woman ahead of her time and of her time. She has led the way for women in business and in philanthropy. Now she steps forward to help young people who often have no safe and nurturing place to turn,” said Michael Marsicano of Foundation for the Carolinas. “Her voice has such credibility, donors will follow where they might not otherwise have gone.”

Even after 127 years, the Belks are considered the South’s first family of retail. 




Supporting LGBT youth became personal for Sally Gambrell, who runs the foundation, after one of her teenage sons came out to her recently. Time Out Youth’s programs were there to help him.
“Right now, I’m in shock at everything going on in this state,” she said, noting her son “is the way God made him.”

She added that her mother backs donation fully, in part because she didn’t like the idea of anyone mistreating one of her grandsons because he’s gay.

“Not all families are as understanding—other children who come out may not be as lucky to still have a home. I think this [shelter] could save lives.”

If you want to donate to Time Out Youth, visit their website.

Read more articles from NewNowNext, here.

Wednesday, March 1, 2017

In Defense of Gender Revolution


March 01 2017 
 
 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
A new mom settles into the couch across from me in my office. She called this week to schedule an appointment because her 17-year-old child just announced he was transgender and identified as a boy. As we begin to talk, the mom says, "If [he] had told us [he] was gay or lesbian, it would have been a no-brainer. But this gender stuff? We just don’t get it."

This is certainly not the first time I’ve heard this from a parent. In 2017, most people living in the United States know someone in their immediate circle who is lesbian, gay, or bisexual — a family member, neighbor, coworker. Lesbian, gay, and bisexual people have come out in popular culture, music, film, and television, in sports, in politics and government, even in many faith communities. Most college students have peers who identify as LGB. Even my middle-school daughter knows classmates who are out as gay or lesbian. But the T has been a different story. 
 
Yes, we have had more adult trans people like Laverne Cox, Janet Mock, Aydian Dowling, and others come out in major media, but most adults in America still do not know transgender people within their immediate social, familial, or professional networks. As a result, gender identity and gender expression, and the understanding of gender as distinct from biological sex, are still unfamiliar. While this is rapidly changing among adolescents and young adults, those of us who are over 25 often struggle to make sense of the “gender revolution” that is occurring all around us. And given how trans children can come out much younger than their LGB counterparts, the stories of their families are making a very different kind of impact.

This is why the recent National Geographic documentary Gender Revolution, hosted by Katie Couric, is so important. This two-hour special provides comprehensive and accessible definitions of terms often confused: biological sex (the sex we are assigned at birth), gender identity (our own internal understanding of our gender), gender expression (how we express our gender visually in the world), and sexual orientation (who we are attracted to). It presents up-to-date information about the differences between being born with an intersex condition and being transgender. It reviews the most recent scientific research that increasingly indicates a biological component to the development of transgender identity in utero. Beyond this, Katie Couric’s conversations with trans youth and their parents as well as transgender adults offer profound insights into the day-to-day emotions and experiences of these individuals and families.

When families first reach out to me, they are often confused, fearful, and unsure where to turn for the information and support they need to effectively parent their trans or gender-diverse children and youth. It is not unusual for me to spend 45 minutes on the first phone call because of how much they need to talk about and make sense of this new information about their child — whether it is a young child with gender-diverse interests and expression or an adolescent who just disclosed their trans or gender-fluid identity. These parents often feel isolated and making that first connection with someone who understands is critical. 

As a parent myself, I am frequently aware that the task of raising healthy children does not come with an owner’s manual. Each child is unique and requires new learning about how to parent them effectively and affirmatively. Raising trans children and youth to live healthy, happy, meaningful, and compassionate adult lives requires that each of us be willing to open our minds and hearts to new ways of understanding and experiencing gender identity and expression. As Couric says, “We’re all a lot more complicated than we’ve assumed.”

Couric’s vulnerability about what she does and does not understand, her openness to deeply listen to the struggles of these individuals, and her commitment and compassion in sharing their stories open a window of understanding for all of us. It’s not just parents who need the information presented in Gender Revolution; we all need to hear these stories. Our transgender and gender-diverse youth need and deserve acceptance and support from all the adults in their lives — parents, grandparents, aunts and uncles, teachers, doctors, neighbors, and faith community leaders.

Because of lack of understanding and acceptance, isolation, and discrimination, more than 40 percent of trans youth and adults attempt suicide compared to only 4.6 percent in the general population. Eighty-two percent of transgender youth report that they feel unsafe at school, 44 percent have been abused physically (punched, shoved, etc.), and 67 percent have been bullied online.

As a clinician, pastor, parent, and transgender man, the message of this film and our responsibility is clear. Vanessa and JR Ford, whose family is featured in the film, put it this way “Do you want a happy child?”

Increasingly for the parents of transgender and gender creative children the answer is a resounding “Yes!” and this film will be a catalyst for change among many. Thank you, Katie Couric and National Geographic, for opening hearts and minds.

ELIJAH NEALY is a licensed clinical social worker and assistant professor in the social work department at the University of Saint Joseph in West Hartford, Conn.

Read more articles from The Advocate, here.
 

United Religions Initiative Joins With UNAIDS to Fight HIV

From left: UNAIDS executive director Michel Sidibe, URI global envoy Mussie Hailu and UNAIDS representative Rosemary Museminali  Courtesy of URI

A grassroots interfaith network, URI builds bridges between religious cultures.

March 1, 2017


____________________________________________________________________________________ 


United Religions Initiative (URI), a global interfaith network, is joining the fight against AIDS. Although many of its grassroots groups across the world have already been engaged in prevention and support, URI is now committing to further its work by partnering with the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV and AIDS (UNAIDS).

According to a URI press release, the idea of collaborating came about earlier this year during the African Union Heads of States meeting in Ethiopia. Specifically, the partnership came about when Mussie Hailu, URI’s regional director for Africa and global envoy of URI, met with UNAIDS executive secretary Michel Sidibé and Rosemary Museminali, UNAIDS representative to the African Union and United Nations Economic Commission for Africa.

To reach its goals, URI works with its 830 member groups and organizations, called Cooperation Circles. URI’s overarching goals are to cultivate peace and bring together people from different cultural and religious backgrounds. To learn more about it, visit URI.org.

To learn about UNAIDS, which unites the efforts of 10 United Nation organizations and the World Bank to fight AIDS, visit UNAIDS.org.

Read more articles from POZ, here.
  

How one gay man’s battle with Aids shaped Disney’s ‘Beauty and the Beast’

Howard Ashman passed away on 14 March 1991



03/01/2017


____________________________________________________________________________________ 
 

Disney’s Beauty and the Beast remains one of the world’s most enduring and popular romance stories, but the original 1991 cartoon could have turned out much differently were it not for one gay man’s tragic struggle with Aids.

As the stars of the upcoming live-action remake, Emma Watson and Dan Stevens, sit down with Winq’s sister-title Attitude for our new April issue – available to download now and in shops today (1 March) – the film’s director Bill Condon reveals the heartbreaking true story that helped shape the 1991 film, and how it inspired him to create Disney’s first explicitly gay character on film.

The director reveals how the work of Beauty and the Beast‘s lyricist Howard Ashman shaped the story audiences know and love today, as the American playwright battled with Aids while working on the film.

“Disney had been developing Beauty and the Beast for decades,” Condon explains. “But there was a specific version they were working on developing in the Eighties.”

“On the heels of The Little Mermaid they showed it to [composer] Alan Menken and Howard Ashman. Ashman had just found out he had Aids, and it was his idea, not only to make it into a musical but also to make Beast one of the two central characters; until then it had mostly been Belle’s story that they had been telling.

Condon continues: “And specifically for him it was a metaphor for Aids. He was cursed and this curse had brought sorrow on all those people who loved him and maybe there was a chance for a miracle and a way for the curse to be lifted. It was a very concrete thing that he was doing.”

Tragically, Ashman passed away on 14 March 1991, just four days after the first screening of the original film. He would go on to win two posthumous Grammy Awards, but his real legacy would be the lasting effect on the Beauty and the Beast story – one that will be relaunched into the public consciousness when Disney’s live-action remake hits screens on 17 March.

As well as Ashman’s story and news that the upcoming Beauty and the Beast remake will break historic ground with Disney’s first gay character on film, Attitude’s April issue also sees the film’s leads, Watson and Stevens, discuss the underlying queer sensibility which helped make 1991’s cartoon iteration resonate so profoundly with many gay men.

“I think it was really important for Dan and I to develop and understand why each of our characters feel as if they don’t fit in,” says Emma.

“I certainly felt watching the original that I wanted to know more about why Belle feels that she’s different and why she wants to be different and why she’s naturally different.”




The April issue of Attitude is out now. To buy in print, click here or subscribe at subscribeme.to/attitude. To buy a digital copy, visit pocketmags.com/attitude.

Read more articles from Wing, here.
 

When We Fall in Ratings, We Fail Our Movement


March 01 2017
 
 
__________________________________________________________________________________ 
 
 
On Monday, ABC made television history by airing When We Rise, the first installment of a miniseries by Dustin Lance Black that documents the progress of the LGBT rights movement. The timing couldn’t have been better. Just days after the Trump administration rescinded education guidelines protecting transgender students, this production was a moving reminder of the need for different vulnerable groups to work together for equality.

Did you watch it? Probably not. The ratings were the lowest among the big four networks during the 9 p.m. Monday time slot, despite having a star-studded cast, opening to positive reviews, and following ratings juggernaut The Bachelor. When We Rise pulled in just 2.95 million viewers; that was less than sitcoms like CBS's Superior Donuts and Two Broke Girls. 
 
If you were watching Two Broke Girls instead of a groundbreaking depiction of our history then, well, you're part of the problem. In an era when LGBT folks, people of color, and their rights are under attack, positive representations of us and our movement are more essential than ever to preserving progress. In our hearts, we understand this. This is why millions of people showed up at demonstrations like the Women’s March and as well as airports to protest Trump’s travel ban. It’s why people deleted Uber and shopped at Nordstrom. And it’s why countless more have committed to marching on Washington, D.C., this July in a mass demonstration of LGBT pride.

Numbers matter, which is why Trump was so infuriated that the crowd from his inauguration looked tiny when juxtaposed with Obama’s and that of the Women’s March. So, why can we trek to the National Mall, ride Lyfts, and shop at a high-end department store, but we can’t turn on the television set to support productions that are supporting us? This is the easiest way to resist Donald Trump and his army of trolls. They also understand the power of numbers. It’s why they worked to ruin the all-female Ghostbusters film and campaigned to delete Netflix in response to the upcoming television production of Dear White People.

In contrast, LGBT people and their allies are doing an abysmal job in viewing and supporting queer content. Moonlight, a film about a black gay youth, made history by winning the Academy Award for Best Picture — yet it had the lowest box-office numbers of all the nominees. Last week, poor ratings also caused CBS to pull Doubt, the first network TV show to feature a trans actress (Laverne Cox) in a regular, main-cast trans role. The timing was cruel and horrible, occurring in the same week that the trans education guidelines were rescinded and celebrities cried “protect trans kids.”

Do you want to know how to protect trans kids? Protect trans TV shows. Because Doubt is no longer on the air, viewers on CBS — a network with real red-state reach — could have seen Cox’s character, an attorney, strike up a romantic relationship with a cisgender man and help defend a trans victim of violence. These storylines would have been firsts for the network, and they would have occurred in a crucial moment leading up to trans student Gavin Grimm’s Supreme Court battle this month. This yanked trans representation is a missed opportunity to debunk the harmful "bathroom predator" myth. It also would have helped countless scared trans kids across the country know they're normal and not alone.

Yet, in Doubt's place, CBS will be airing Criminal Minds: Beyond Borders, a show about travel- and immigration-related crime, which is not exactly a coup for liberals. For their part, CBS assured The Advocate that Doubt was pulled due to low viewership, and not politics.

"The programming decision regarding Doubt was based solely on ratings, nothing else. The series opened to disappointing numbers and declined significantly in its second week," said a CBS representative, who promised that the "11 remaining episodes of Doubt will be broadcast on CBS at a later date and will be presented on cbs.com as well."

It's comforting to know that Doubt will air — and it is truly a sign of progress that network television is airing queer content at all. But let’s be real. For Hollywood, LGBT rights are not a charity case. This is a business. If you want to see a transgender lawyer, a queer activist of color, or a bisexual president on TV, then you’d better view the show. Support it. Tell your family and friends about it. If you don’t, then the production will fail. And if it fails, that decreases the likelihood that another show showcasing queer characters will make it to air.

Start tonight, when When We Rise debuts its second installment. Watch it. It’s an excellent review of the modern LGBT movement, with some amazing performances from a fine ensemble. Even if a historical drama is not your cup of tea, the miniseries contains many lessons about how to organize and resist, which presents a wonderful educational opportunity for the times we live in. And remember, Doubt is coming back to the air, most likely in the summer months. Let’s be prepared and mark our calendars when the date is announced.

After its win, Moonlight is going back into theaters in wide release this weekend. Watch that, too. It’s stunning, beautiful, topically important, and made history as the first LGBT film to win Best Picture. Let’s not disappoint it again in the box office. #OscarsSoWhite was a wonderful wakeup call to the entertainment industry that they must create and honor diverse productions; but if no one sees these productions — and if we, as queer consumers, do not accept some responsibility for the content that is created, and match our outrage for erasure with a movie ticket — then there is no financial reward for Hollywood to make more.

For if these television shows and films succeed, they have the power to change hearts and minds. Frankly, we can use all the hearts and minds we can get right now. We also much show Hollywood and the world the strength of our numbers, which have never been greater. We have power.  We are a force to be reckoned with. We have risen.

But if these productions fail, then our narratives and our voices are lost. In a time when so much is at stake, this is a failure we cannot afford. After all, there are worse fates than watching network television.

DANIEL REYNOLDS is an editor at The Advocate. Follow him on Twitter @dnlreynolds.
 
Read more articles from The Advocate, here.