Wednesday, July 6, 2016

Milestones in the Era of Effective HIV Treatment

Milestones in the Era of Effective HIV Treatment


June 24, 2016 By Benjamin Ryan

The first HIV med, Retrovir (zidovudine, or AZT), was approved in 1987. Over the next few years, additional antiretrovirals (ARVs) were introduced in the same drug class (nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, also known as NRTIs, or nukes). But using only one or two meds from the same drug class wasn’t enough to fully suppress the virus, and the crisis period of the epidemic raged on. In December 1995, the first protease inhibitor (PI), Invirase (saquinavir), was approved, and a new era of combination therapy was set to begin. Here’s a timeline of the highlights:

1996
  • The first viral load test is approved.
  • The first non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI, or non-nuke), Viramune (nevirapine), is approved.
  • Norvir (ritonavir), a PI that would become a booster of other ARVs, is approved.
  • At the 11th International AIDS Conference in Vancouver, numerous studies demonstrate the efficacy of triple-combination antiretroviral (ARV) treatment, ushering in the era of what was then called highly active antiretroviral treatment, or HAART.
1997
  • The first combination ARV tablet, Combivir (zidovudine/lamivudine), is approved.
  • AIDS-related deaths drop 47 percent in one year.
1998
  • The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services issues the first federal HIV treatment guidelines, recommending treatment for those with fewer than 500 CD4s, in keeping with the “hit early, hit hard” philosophy of the time.
2001
  • In an about-face, U.S. treatment guidelines switch to recommending starting ARVs when CD4s have dropped to 200 or below.
  • Viread (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, or TDF), which comes with bone and kidney toxicities, is approved and goes on to become the most widely prescribed ARV.
2002
  • The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria in developing nations is launched.
2003
  • The first entry inhibitor, the injectable Fuzeon (enfuvirtide), is approved.
  • President George W. Bush launches the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief, or PEPFAR, pledging to spend $15 billion to combat the disease in poorer nations in five years.
2006
  • The first once-daily, single-tablet ARV regimen, Atripla (efavirenz/TDF/emtricitabine), is approved.
  • The SMART trial is stopped early. The expansive global study investigated whether interrupting HIV treatment could reduce the risk of diseases thought to be the result of ARV toxicities. But those who interrupted treatment actually had worse health outcomes. The surprise findings spur research into the link between HIV, chronic inflammation and non-AIDS-defining conditions such as heart disease.
2007
  • The first integrase inhibitor, Isentress (raltegravir), is approved.
  • The first oral entry inhibitor, Selzentry (maraviroc), is approved.
2008
  • As HIV treatments improve, U.S. treatment guidelines up the CD4 threshold for starting ARVs to 350.
2010
  • As San Francisco recommends HIV treatment regardless of CD4 count, U.S. guidelines advise starting ARVs when CD4s drop to 500, while the threshold set by the World Health Organization (WHO) is 350 CD4s.
2011
  • The HPTN 052 study finds that starting ARVs reduces the risk of transmitting HIV through heterosexual sex by 96 percent, launching the treatment-as-prevention (TasP) era.
2012
  • U.S. guidelines recommend treatment for all people living with HIV, regardless of their CD4 count.
  • The FDA approves Truvada (TDF/emtricitabine) for use as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP).
2013
  • UNAIDS reports that global AIDS-related deaths have fallen 30 percent since peaking in 2005.
  • WHO recommends treatment once CD4s hit 500 or below.
2014
  • Interim results from the ongoing PARTNER study find that there have been no transmissions between partners in gay or straight mixed-HIV-status couples in which the HIV-positive partner has an undetectable viral load. Researchers estimate that the actual transmission risk may be close to zero, or in fact zero.
2015
  • The placebo arm of the global START trial is terminated early when it becomes clear that there is a lower risk of various negative health outcomes associated with starting ARVs when CD4s are above 500 compared with waiting until they hit 350. In response, WHO supports treatment for all, regardless of CD4 count.
  • Genvoya (elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide, or TAF) is the first approved combination tablet to include an updated version of tenofovir that is safer for bones and kidneys.
For a more comprehensive timeline, click here.

For more articles from POZ click here: https://www.poz.com


What Is Chronic Inflammation and Why Is It Such a Big Deal for People With HIV?


A primer on the harms of HIV-related chronic inflammation, what treatments are being researched and what you can do to reduce inflammation and improve your long-term health

April 5, 2016 By Benjamin Ryan 


Antiretrovirals (ARVs) have added decades to the life spans of people living with HIV who have access to treatment. Nevertheless, when compared with HIV-negative people, those taking treatment for the virus still have a higher risk of various health problems typically associated with aging. The reasons behind these increased health risks still aren’t very well understood, but the scientific community is eagerly looking for answers. Researchers are inclined to point the finger at a phenomenon known as chronic inflammation as a main culprit.

When you get a cut or infection, your immune system jump-starts a cascading process that sends to the site a diverse army of cells that promote healing and infection control and give rise to inflammation. Included in this complex, interconnected battalion are CD4 and CD8 cells (known as “helper” and “killer” T-cells), antibodies, clotting factors and pro-inflammatory cytokines, among many others.

Normally, certain cells will turn off this healthy inflammatory process when the healing or infection-fighting process is complete. But sometimes, inflammation persists over the long term and can become counterproductive, causing damage to healthy cells and tissues. In HIV-negative people, chronic inflammation is tied to a host of diseases, including cardiovascular, autoimmune, liver and kidney diseases and cancer.

HIV itself appears to give rise to chronic inflammation. The virus also leads to dysregulation of the immune system, which can further fuel inflammation. Many scientists believe that HIV-related chronic inflammation contributes to HIV-positive individuals’ increased risk of cardiovascular disease, neurocognitive disease, osteoporosis (bone loss), liver disease, kidney disease, frailty and some non-AIDS-defining cancers. These are all conditions associated with getting older. People with HIV tend to get them at younger ages than their HIV-negative counterparts.

Within weeks of infection, HIV begins a massive assault on the gut, which has a high concentration of CD4 cells. Even very early treatment of the virus may not totally reverse this damage, which appears to cause chronic inflammation by allowing harmful microbes to seep into the body (in a process called microbial translocation), thus spurring more immune activation and chronic inflammation.

While HIV treatment does help fight the immune dysfunction and chronic inflammation caused by the virus, ARVs don’t necessarily wipe out these effects. For one thing, having an undetectable viral load doesn’t mean the virus is totally silent. Low-level viral replication may still persist—and at a high enough level to prompt a constant state of alert from the immune system, a chronic inflammatory state. Consequently, over-activated immune cells may be driven to a state of exhaustion, similar to what is seen in older people. HIV may also disrupt the cells that turn inflammation on or off, possibly compromising the body’s ability to properly regulate inflammation.

People with HIV tend to have higher rates of other viral infections, such as hepatitis B or C viruses (HBV, HCV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV, which is in the herpes family), which may also contribute to chronic inflammation and immune activation.

Additionally, HIV may cause scarring in both the thymus and the lymph nodes, leading to interference in the body’s ability to fight infections. The thymus is an organ in the chest that is responsible for manufacturing T-cells, while the lymph nodes are responsible for coordinating immune responses to infections.

The numerous serious health problems to which chronic inflammation could give rise may sound alarming. But Steven Deeks, MD, a professor of medicine at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), who is an expert in HIV-related chronic inflammation, says, “It’s important to emphasize that the effect that we’re talking about is not dramatic.” Such an effect, he says, “will likely not have much of an impact on people’s quality of life—their overall health, really—until people are in their sixth, seventh decades of life, at which point in time it could very well be much more apparent.”

Research into treatments for chronic inflammation:

“I think the jury is still out whether the best approach is to target the inflammatory response or rather to target the root drivers of the inflammatory response: HIV itself, coinfections, microbial translocation,” says Peter Hunt, MD, an associate professor of medicine at UCSF who also studies HIV-related chronic inflammation. “One of the problems is that we don’t really have successful interventions to block those root causes; we don’t have any interventions that turn off HIV expression.”

Several research studies have suggested that the cholesterol-lowering medications known as statins may lower chronic inflammation among people with HIV and protect them against its harmful effects. But results from a study that provides gold-standard scientific evidence of such benefits from statins are still lacking. Researchers are currently enrolling a planned 6,500 participants into such a trial, called REPRIEVE. The study includes people with HIV who are taking ARVs and who wouldn’t normally be in a position to take a statin; they will be randomized to either receive a statin or a placebo. The study will hopefully answer whether statins’ anti-inflammatory effects will translate into a lowered risk of disease, such as heart attack or cancer, among people with HIV. Unfortunately, results aren’t expected until 2021.

Other on-the-market medications currently under investigation as anti-inflammatory agents for people with HIV include Micardis (telmisartan), a blood-pressure medication, and the diabetes medication Vildagliptin (galvus). Research has already shown that aspirin does not apparently help HIV-related inflammation.

Scientists are also investigating to see whether probiotics, which promote desirable bacteria in the digestive system, may affect the body’s so-called microbiome in a way that helps lower gut-related inflammation.

Seeking to directly affect inflammatory pathways, researchers are looking at drugs used for inflammatory diseases, like the autoimmune disease rheumatoid arthritis, and are even looking at some cancer treatments. Other research is examining drugs that inhibit major indicators of inflammation, called biomarkers, such as the cytokines interleuken-1 or -6 (IL-1, IL-6).

Experts generally agree that a cure for HIV, if it is ever developed, remains decades away (contrary to recent erroneous news reports). In the meantime, as researchers strive to develop ways to shrink the size of the viral reservoir and, in turn, likely reduce low-level viral replication, they may wind up with treatments that, even if they don’t cure someone, end up dampening chronic inflammation.

Things you can do to fight chronic inflammation and its potentially harmful effects:

According to Deeks, the long-term damage caused by HIV-related chronic inflammation may be easier to prevent when people are younger, as opposed to reversing the damage once people are elderly.

Ways to prevent such damage include:
  • Early treatment. Research has shown that starting ARVs as soon after infection as possible reduces the likelihood of health problems linked to inflammation, such as heart attack and certain cancers.
  • Take your ARVs every single day. Recent research found that anything less than 100 percent adherence was tied to higher inflammation.
  • Don’t smoke. Smoking is especially harmful among people living with HIV (not to mention highly common) and can exacerbate inflammation in the arteries.
  • Eat a healthy diet. Research has shown that the so-called Mediterranean diet reduces the risk of heart attack or stroke.
  • Get moving. Regular exercise reduces your risk of numerous health problems.
  • Shed body fat. Fat tissue may be a source of inflammation.
  • Treat coinfections. Hep C is now curable through as little as eight weeks of treatment, and hep B is treatable. Both infections can cause severe damage to the liver; even well-treated HIV can accelerate such damage.

Ryan White CARE Act Is Still Vital to U.S. HIV Care


Ryan White CARE Act Is Still Vital to U.S. HIV Care

July 5, 2016


Even with the rollout of the Affordable Care Act (ACA, or Obamacare), the Ryan White CARE Act is still a key safety net supporting care for people living with HIV. Publishing their findings in Clinical Infectious Diseases, researchers studied data from the HIV Research Network, a consortium of HIV clinics across the United States, looking at information on 28,374 HIV patients at 10 clinics, comparing data from 2011 to 2013 with that from the first months of 2014.

The ACA’s marketplace private insurance plans went into effect on January 1, 2014, along with Medicaid expansion in those states that had decided to initiate that particular broadening of health services for those with less than 138 percent of the federal poverty level (the Supreme Court made doing so optional).

This study included data from clinics in three states that expanded Medicaid, including California, Oregon and Maryland, and two that did not, Texas and Florida. Another four clinics were located in New York, which expanded its own Medicaid program in 2001.

Individuals’ participation in the Ryan White program in the non-expansion states Texas and Florida did not significantly vary between the pre- and post-ACA rollout periods; 52 percent used Ryan White for coverage during both periods. Use of Ryan White among those in the expansion states California, Oregon and Maryland fell from 28 percent to 2013 between the two periods. This drop was not as steep as experts had anticipated, indicating the continued need for Ryan White’s support. Ryan White use in New York State did not vary between the periods, remaining at 20 percent.

“Our study shows that Congress and the White House should continue strong support for the Ryan White HIV/AIDS Program despite the ACA,” Stephen Berry, MD, an HIV specialist and assistant professor of medicine at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine and the study’s lead author, said in a press release. “The program’s support remains the only mechanism for tens of thousands to receive basic HIV care to prevent HIV transmission and death from AIDS.”

To read a press release about the study, click here.

To read the study abstract, click here.

To read more articles from POZ.com click here: https://www.poz.com

CD4 Monitoring for People With HIV Could Be Reduced to Every 6 to 12 Months


CD4 Monitoring for People With HIV Could Be Reduced to Every 6 to 12 Months

July 1, 2016

At least in the short term, reducing CD4 monitoring among those with stable HIV suppression from every three months to every six to 12 months appears safe, not leading to any additional AIDS-defining illnesses or death, aidsmap reports. Publishing their findings in the Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, researchers from the HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration studied data on 39,029 people with HIV who participated in six observational cohort studies in Europe and the United States, started antiretrovirals (ARVs) for the first time and were virologically suppressed within 12 months.

A total of 265 of the individuals died during the studies’ follow-up periods. There were 690 cases of the composite outcome of death or AIDS-defining illnesses.

Compared with monitoring CD4s every three months, doing so every nine months was associated with a 14 percent lower risk of death, and doing so every 12 months was associated with an 18 percent lower risk of death. However, these differences were not statistically significant, meaning they could have occurred by chance.

The risk of experiencing virologic failure (a viral load greater than 200) after 18 months was 26 percent lower among those monitored every nine months (not a statistically significant difference) and 2.35-fold greater among those monitored every 12 months (a statistically significant difference), compared with three-month monitoring.

Compared with three-month monitoring, the average difference in CD4 count was a respective 5.3 fewer CD4s (not statistically significant) and 31.7 fewer CD4s (a statistically significant difference) among those monitored every nine and 12 months.

The rates of AIDS-defining illness or death were similar across all three monitoring intervals.

“Our findings suggest that monitoring frequency of virologically suppressed individuals can be decreased from every three months to every six, nine or 12 months with respect to clinical outcomes,” the study authors concluded. “Because effects of different monitoring strategies could take years to materialize, longer follow-up is needed to fully evaluate this question.”

To read the aidsmap article, click here.

To read the study abstract, click here.

To read more articles visit POZ.com here:  https://www.poz.com
 

2016 HIV DRUG CHART



 
Find more articles here: https://www.poz.com/

Most Common HIV Side Effects and How They're Treated



EXPERTS: Why Hate is a Public Health Emergency

When this man running for President of the United States, continues to spew HATE at every turn, it is no wonder that our society thinks HATE is no big deal. It is time to wake up AMERICA an realize that we DO NOT need a HATE FILLED MAN like this RUNNING our great country!!! Donald Trump is an INFECTIOUS AGENT OF HATE!!!! These are my thoughts not thought from the following article. David